The aim of this series of posts is to focus on the habits of excellent practice; our default mode. As I have said elsewhere, every class is a mixed ability class so, regardless of our views on selection or setting, all teachers need to cater for students with a range of skills, aptitudes and dispositions. One student’s Deep End is another’s Shallow End and there is an important difference between a healthy period of struggling and drowning; our goal has got to be that all students make excellent progress, regardless of their starting point, without making things too safe, or beyond reach. Of course, the wider the ability range in a class, the more difficult and critical it is. It’s an enormous challenge, but in Great Lessons, there is no question that this is happening.
In practice, there are a number of modes of differentiation that teachers typically deploy through the resources used:
- Extension Material: very typically, the ‘extra work’ students can do if they’ve finished the standard work.
- Support Material: extra layers of scaffolding and simplification to help students keep up.
- ‘Differentiation by Outcome': often mis-understood and mis-used but actually a crucial form of differentiation where the same stimulus leads to open-ended responses
- Completely different tasks: sometimes necessary but complicated.
Then there are the classroom management methods with various groupings that can be adopted to facilitate differentiated learning. Slide 7 on this slideshow covers this well:
However, in keeping with the theme of the blog series, I am interested in the spirit of differentiation as much as the techniques. For me, Great Lessons are characterised by teaching and learning where differentiation is integral to the entire process. ie the notion that one size does not fit all and that different learners will be progressing and different rates is absolutely explicit and embedded. (To those who think this is just obvious, well, you’d be surprised how often it isn’t!).
OK, so how does the spirit of differentiation manifest itself?
1. The teacher knows the students
This is the bedrock. When we meet a new class, they may look different but as learners, they are faceless… we need to get to know what their learning looks like. The more students you have and the less often you teach the class in a week, the harder this is and you need to work harder at it. Knowing their names is a start.. but knowing them as learners is crucial. In great lessons, the nuanced teacher knowledge of the students’ needs is always evident.
This is where baseline data is very powerful. We have all kinds of data: prior attainment measures, CATs or MidYIS scores, reading ages, SEN information…. BUT, the data is irrelevant if it doesn’t change teacher-student interactions. The key is to study the data, to look for issues and to assimilate it into knowledge; ie the stuff you carry around in your head. It has to come off the page. Too much data can impede that process so we need to be wary of data-overload/over-kill. That said, if you only ever give a child books they cannot read…..
Then, of course, we need to re-evaluate continually. We can’t assume a child is defined by the spreadsheet we were given at the start of term. Data tracking has its place here too and some systems are quite elaborate – I found this on an image search:
Fancy! Does it help? Well it could, provided that you are acting on the information. Does the tracking then lead to you up-dating your knowledge bank that then guides you as you plan and deliver your lessons?
But, of course, the most important sources of information are informal lesson feedback from your day-to-day interactions, followed by the information you glean from marking books and tests. I love David Didau’s insistence that marking is planning, for this very reason. We also need to be open to feedback from parents. Very often students will report to their parents that they are finding work too easy or too difficult before the teacher has noticed and we need to listen and encourage dialogue of this kind; to dismiss it is folly!
Assimilating all this information so that lesson activities and the level of challenge are finely tuned is the goal. Knowing your students is critical. But, it is only the start. The point is that you do something with this knowledge…
2. The differentiation issue is explicit
In great lessons, the language of differentiation permeates the whole discussion:
The learning objectives are inherently differentiated – and, no, I am NOT advocating that you write these slavishly on the board! But it should be clear that there are various learning goals that different students should be aiming for. In great lessons, the teacher cuts to the chase, anticipating that certain students will need to push forward or need support, right from the start. At other times, it is sensible and desirable to see how people get on with a core activity before they diverge. This requires some routines:
What do you do if you don’t know what to do? I love the Jim Smith (aka @thelazyteacher) idea of ‘three Bs before me: brain, book, buddy). Teaching self-help learning strategies is a vital tool in the kit.
What do you do if you’ve finished? Ideally, any activity should be set up in advance so that there is no such thing as ‘finished’. In great lessons, you never see students waiting, hands up or killing time, with nothing to do. More subtly, the classroom culture should encourage pushing on to the next level, if you’re finding this easy. Great teachers fuel this ‘can do’ spirit that gives student confidence to get into the deep end at every opportunity.
I think it is legitimate – actually it is necessary – to give students a degree of ownership and responsibility for directing their learning in terms of the level of challenge. Teachers need to create the opportunities but students need to learn that, ultimately, it is up to them to find their level; don’t suffer in silence and don’t coast….teachers are not mind readers and they’re not the ones sitting the exams. Then there is also a consideration of self-esteem. It can hold a student back to know they are on the ‘thick table’ (I have heard that phrase) but, at the same time, the issue of ability can’t be tip-toed around. Again it comes down to culture. Mixing up the groupings over time, using a range of differentiation strategies and creating a general deep-end high-challenge spirit is needed; knowing how students deal with this on the self-esteem scale is part of that knowledge bank, just as much as their NC sub-level.
3. Differentiation is embedded and habitual
Although I am interested in the notion of a ‘spirit of differentiation’, in practice it comes down to concrete strategies. There are lots of examples. See this from David Didau (again – I know, he’s quite brilliant isn’t he!)
In recent lessons I’ve seen some excellent approaches:
- Self-leveling resources: students able to tackle Pythagoras questions of increasing difficulty, self-checking answers and moving through at different rates.
- Bronze, Silver and Gold questions: questions on cards, at different levels with students able to self-select according to confidence and success.. with teacher prompting some to move on or consolidate.
- Scaffolding frameworks at different levels: essay writing guidance with varying levels of structure. In this example three levels: one with no support; one with paragraph outlines and another with sentence-level starters.
- Homework choices: This is a mock-up of a strategy I’ve seen where the overarching project had numerous options for the tasks at different levels. I’ve made this generic but it would be specific to a subject in practice.
- Leadership grouping: more able students given leadership responsibility in each of a number of mixed ability groups with a ‘group goal’ that required any group member to report back. Just one of many group structure strategies.
So many strategies to choose. In great lessons, the strategies are woven into the fabric of the lesson with one overarching strategy that is common: Inclusive Questioning. This is the teacher’s great skill: to bring all students in a class into a question and answer exchange.. adjusting the level of questioning to the student in a subtle way. Mini-whiteboards are brilliant for this...so you can feed off the answers. Think-Pair-Share is another superb method. But the spirit of differentiation makes these things completely automatic, embedded, everyday features of lessons. Everyone engaged; everyone challenged.
4. No student is held back by any other
Let’s not be under any illusions. This is the core of the challenge; this is the sharp-end. Can it be done? I believe so. If every class is a mixed ability class and, in all contexts, there are teachers delivering Great Lessons every day, the proof is there.